From aviva@irn.org  Sat Mar 25 15:55:14 2000
Return-Path: <aviva@irn.org>
Received: from DaVinci.NetVista.net (root@mail.netvista.net [206.170.46.10])
	by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA16076
	for <dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 15:55:12 -0500 (EST)
Received: [from aviva.irn.org (router.irn.org [170.1.98.117])\n	by DaVinci.NetVista.net (8.10.0/8.8.8) with SMTP id e2PKt3420609\n	for <dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>; Sat, 25 Mar 2000 12:55:03 -0800 (PST)\n	(envelope-from aviva@irn.org)]
Message-Id: <4.1.20000325124601.00a93100@pop3.netvista.net>
X-Sender: aviva@pop3.netvista.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 
Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2000 12:46:26 -0800
To: dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca
From: Aviva Imhof <aviva@irn.org>
Subject: salween watch hotmail
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Status: OR

SALWEEN WATCH HOTMAILOUT

March 24, 2000, Volume 5

********************************************
[Introduction]
(1) TERRA: A Dam For Burma's Generals
(2) PANYA CONSULTANTS: Hyrdopower Potential And Water
          Diversion Form The Salween Basin
(3) SHAN: The Salween Dam Mineral Survey Continues
(4) SHAN: Wa's Applying for Logging Concession In The
          Salween Dam Area
(5) THE NATION: GMS Power to Kick-Start Laos Dam Project
(6) IRN DAY OF ACTION - MARCH 14
********************************************

Dear Friends,

Included in this mailing are several documents that add to the growing
material we are collecting about the proposed Ta Sang Dam on the Salween
River in Shan State, Burma.  The TERRA article provides a good overview of
the situation and concrete reasons why the dam is a bad idea and should be
opposed.  Panya Consultants presented the paper that is included here at a
conference in Chiang Mai, Thailand in September of last year.
Unfortunately, the organizers did not invite NGO's or people who are
affected by the dams to the conference.  The paper is included here to give
insight into the builders' perspectives on the perceived benefits of the
dams and the plans under consideration for water diversion.  The information
included also confirms that a German company, Lahmeyer International,
conducted the pre-feasibility study on the Ta Sang Dam.  The Shan Herald
Agency for News contributes two articles to this volume of the Salween Watch
Hotmailout, providing updated information on the logging and mining in the
Dam area.  In the article from The Nation, GMS Power honorary adviser, Subin
Pinkayan, is cited, confirming that GMS is working directly with the Burmese
on dam projects.  This mailing ends with the announcement of our virtual
protest against the Ta Sang Dam, a part of the International Rivers' Network
Day of Action earlier this month.  Check out the IRN web site for a reminder
that we have many allies who support our fight for human rights and a sound
environment.  Look for the announcement about the Salween Watch's own
website in the next Hotmailout.  As always, if you have information you
would like to share with us or if you have any questions, we can be reached
at salweenwatch@hotmail.com.

Salween Watch
24 March, 2000
********************************************

(1) TERRA: A Dam For Burma's Generals

(From Watershed: People's Forum on Ecology, Burma, Cambodia, Lao PDR,
Thailand, Vietnam.  Vol. 5 No. 2 November 1999 - February 2000, published by
Towards Ecological Recovery and Regional Alliance - TERRA)

A Thai dam-building company is proposing the construction of a massive
hydroelectric dam on the Salween River in northeastern Burma. Tens of
thousands of local people have already been forcibly relocated from the site
of the proposed TA Sarong dam and its reservoir, by order of Burma's
military dictatorship.

"Recognising that there exist vast potential for joint utilization of energy
resources, particularly hydropower and petroleum resources in the Union of
Myanmar; for the mutual benefits of the peoples of the Kingdom of Thailand
and the Union of Myanmar...

"The Government of the Kingdom of Thailand hereby agrees to cooperate with
the Government of the Union of Myanmar in the implementation of the policy
to sell power to Thailand, and would encourage the purchase of power by the
Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) or other agencies
designated by the Government of the Kingdom of Thailand to buy up to I,500
Megawatt [sic] of electricity power from projects in Myanmar by the year
2010.  (Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Kingdom of
Thailand and the Government or the Union of Myanmar on the Power Purchase
Program from the Union of Myanmar, 4 July 1997)

Two months after the Thai government and Burma's military dictatorship, the
State Law and Order Restoration Council (SLORC), signed this Memorandum of
Understanding, GMS Power Public Co. Ltd. signed a contract with the SLORC's
Myanmar Economic Corporation to study the feasibility of building the Ta
Sarng hydroelectric dam on the Salween River.

With a proposed dam height of 188 meters, Ta Sarng would be the tallest dam
in mainland Southeast Asia.* If built, it would be the first dam to be built
on the 2,400 kilometre-long mainstream of the Salween River, the only
remaining free-flowing major river in the region. The 320,000 square
kilometre Salween River Basin is also the least dammed of the region's major
river basins. However, since the late 1970s, Australian and Japanese
consulting companies and Burmese and Thai state agencies have produced seven
major studies examining the possibility of constructing large dams on the
Salween.

GMS Power is a subsidiary of Thailand's MDX Group of companies. Through GMS,
MDX is involved in dam projects in Cambodia, Lao PDR and China's Yunnan
province. GMS contracted Lahmeyer International, a German consulting firm,
to coordinate the prefeasibility study for the Ta Sarng project (completed
April 1998) and the Electric Power Corporation of Japan to oversee the
project's feasibility study (completed March 1999). The final stage of study
has been described by a GMS spokesperson as the "definite plan", presumably
the detailed engineering design of the project, which is scheduled to begin
in December 1999.

Lahmeyer's prefeasibility study indicates that the concretefaced rockfill Ta
Sarng dam, with an installed generation capacity of 3,300 megawatts, would
be located on the Salween River in the southern area of central Shan State
in northeastern Burma. GMS engineers claim that the project's reservoir
would flood an area of at least 640 square kilometers, storing 36,100
million cubic meters of water -- approximately one-third of the Salween's
average annual flow volume of 119,037 cubic metres.

The Thai-Burma Memorandum of Understanding attempts to justify the
construction of large hydroelectric dams and other large-scale projects for
electricity generation in Burma "for the mutual benefits of the peoples of
the Kingdom of Thailand and the Union of Myanmar". If nothing else, this
statement ignores the experience with large-scale energy sector-related
infrastructure in both Thailand and Burma (e.g., the Thai-Burma Yadana gas
pipeline project, which involved forced labour, extrajudicial murder and
forced relocation extensively documented and criticised intentionally) and
the destruction and human rights violations that go hand-in-hand with these
"development" projects. And that the promise of large-scale projects to
provide the State and its agents with the opportunity for enrichment occurs
at the expense of the citizens of these countries. The constant repetition
of the promises of "mutual benefit" derived from, for example, large dams,
therefore requires detailed examination.

How to destroy a river

A natural river ecosystem and its watershed have evolved together over
thousands of years, created by the natural flows of water, bio-mass and
sediment through the watershed and river. The construction of Ta Sarng would
destroy the delicate balance between the Salween, its tributaries and
watersheds. The Ta Sarng dam would also result in a large, deep reservoir.
The dam's blocking of the river and impoundment of water in the reservoir
would radically alter the natural flow and the ecological, chemical and
biological characteristics of the Salween River.

In the project area, the reservoir would transform the free flowing Salween
River into a deep, slow moving or still water system, up to several hundred
kilometers or more in length. Decaying organic matter can create eutrophic
conditions in the reservoir leading to algae blooms, oxygen depletion and
massive fish kills. Water from the reservoir and directly downstream of the
reservoir is often unfit for human or animal consumption. The conditions of
the reservoir produces changes in the physical and chemical characteristics
of the water, including pH balance, turbidity, oxygen levels, and
temperature both in the reservoir and downstream of the dam when water is
released through the dam's turbines.

The fishes of the Salween River Basin have evolved in a riverine system. If
the river were transformed into a reservoir, most of these fish species
would be extirpated by the reservoir, as will many of the fish species
living downstream of the dam due to the ecological impacts of altered water
flow and the poor quality of water released from the reservoir.

Seasonal fish migrations in the area of the Salween River Basin affected by
the project would be prevented by the dam and the non-river habitat of the
reservoir, while there would be severe impact on fish migrations and
populations downstream of the dam, potentially along a stretch of the river
hundreds of kilometres downstream of the dam.

Forests and fertile lowlands along the Salween River and in the tributary
valleys would be permanently submerged by the reservoir. Many of these areas
are used for seasonal cultivation of crops which serve the needs of local
families and communities. The reservoir will destroy the aquatic and
terrestrial animal habitat of the river and its valley, and radically alter
habitats downstream of the dam.

In the reservoir, species of the riverine ecosystem are likely to be
replaced by other aquatic and water-dependent species able to survive, and
even thrive, in the degraded habitats of the reservoir area. Along the edges
of the Ta Samg dam's reservoir, stagnant pools of water in a large expanse
of bare, moist land will be exposed in the area where the reservoir water
levels rise and fall on a periodic basis. Known as the "draw-down" area,
this new habitat is an ideal breeding ground for malarial mosquitoes.
Several forms of the world's most virulent, treatment-resistant malaria are
already endemic in areas of the Salween River Basin, including the proposed
site of the Ta Sarng project.

All of these impacts would severely affect the means of livelihood security
of communities living along the Salween River. Evidence from large dams
built in Thailand indicates that the impacts of large dams on the means of
livelihood security of communities living upstream and downstream of large
dams is in many ways negative, reducing food supplies and opportunities to
generate income from farming and fishing and resulting in serious impacts on
the health of local people, particularly women, children and the elderly.
Inevitably, these same impacts will occur if the proposed Ta Sarng
hydroelectric dam is built on the Salween River.

How to violate human rights

In the Shan culture, the Salween is called the "Nam Khong". The importance
of the river for the Shan people is illustrated by a popular Shan song by
writer Sai Khorn Fah which includes the phrase, "As long as the Nam Khong
flows, we will have Shan State."**

The site of the proposed Ta Sarng dam and the lower area of the reservoir
are located within an 18,000 square kilometre area of central Shan State in
which more than 300,000 people have been forcibly relocated by SLORC's
[recently renamed the State Peace and Development Council] army. While the
forced removal of local communities from their homelands in a proposed
reservoir area is required by the construction of large dam, only the
proposal, and project studies for Ta Sarng have provided the SLORC/SPDC with
the incentive to forcibly relocate tens of thousands of families living
along the Salween River where the dam and reservoir may be located.

A recent interview with an ethnic Shan village person forcibly relocated
from the proposed reservoir area illustrates the close relations between
local people and their natural environment in the Salween basin and the
connection between forced relocation and the Ta Sarng project.

Question: Did many people in the area of your village catch fish in the
river?

Answer: Everyone fishes in the river! At least one person from every house
goes out to catch fish to eat and to sell in Kali [a nearby market
town)...There are so many fish in the Nam Pang! [tributary of the Salween
There are lots of "ba moong". These are big fish which people like to eat.
It is so easy to catch fish. In one day you can easily fill your canoe with
fish.

Q. Have you heard that the Burmese government is planning to build a dam on
the Salween River at Ta Sarng?

A. Yes, I have heard of this. People in Kunhing [relocation site] are saying
it will definitely happen. The authorities have said so. Everyone from
Kengkham [township] is so worried.

Q. How would you feel about your village being underwater?

A. I can't express what I feel. It would be worse than the death of my
mother and father.

As the project proponent, GMS Power apparently hopes that the Electricity
Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT) would purchase most or all of the
predicted 23,000 gigawatt hours (GWh, 23,000 billion kilowatt hours) that
the Ta Sarng project could generate. However, EGAT is not in a position to
justify the signing of a power purchase agreement (PPA) for Ta Sarng as more
than 30 per cent of its generating capacity (hydroelectric dams, natural
gas-fuelled plants, ete.) is presently unused due to major reductions in the
country's demand for electricity. In the absence of a PPA, it is unlikely
that GMS will convince international commercial banks to provide the
financing for the US$3.5 billion dam in the near future.

Nevertheless, with feasibility studies completed and detailed design
planning soon to begin, a delay in the commencement of constructing Ta Sarng
as a result of reduced electricity demand in Thailand promises only to be
temporary. Successive Thai governments and State agencies have consistently
proven their willingness to do business with private-sector companies
investing in Burma and to attempt to appease the SLORC/SPDC with the profits
of large-scale infrastructure. Only time will tell if Thai society will
refuse to allow Thai governments, State agencies and private companies to do
business with the brutal military dictatorship of the SLORC/SPDC and to
condone the human rights violations and environmental destruction caused by
"development" projects like the proposed Ta Sarng hydroelectric dam in
Burma.

Endnotes
*For comparison, Thailand's tallest dam is the 154 meter Bhumibol dam, while
Vietnam's Hoa Binh dam is 128 metres in height.
** SWAN, Shan Women's Action Network Newsletter, No.1, September 1999.

********************************************

(2) PANYA CONSULTANTS: Hyrdopower Potential And Water  Diversion Form The
Salween Basin by Mr. Choolit Vatcharasinthu and Dr. M.S. Babel (September,
1999)

Workshop on Trans-Boundary Waters: The Salween Basin

Organized by AIT Regional Environmental Management Center - Oregon State
University and University of Victoria

Sponsored by United Nations University and International Water Resources
Association

Chiang Mai, Thailand
13-16 September, 1999

Hydropower potential and water diversion from The Salween Basin
Mr. Choolit Vatcharasinthu and Dr. M. S. Babel

[Some sections of this paper have been omitted because of space and
formatting considerations.  You will be able to read the entire paper on the
Salween Watch web site, available in April, 2000 -- Salween Watch.]

1. Introduction

2.The Salween Basin
2.1 Basic characteristics
2.2 Water resources

3. Hydropower potential and development in Salween Basin
3.1 Main Salween River
3.1.1 Past studies
3.1.2 Recent work
3.2 Tributaries of Salween River

4. The Chao Phraya Basin
4.1 Water resources
4.2 Water budget
4.3 Water demand and shortage

5. Water diversion from Salween Basin
5.1 Water diversion schemes
5.2 Benefit areas 5.3 Project impacts

6. Conclusions and recommendations

References

Abstract:

This chapter briefly describes the characteristics and water resources of
the Salween Basin and reviews the work that has been carried out to assess
the hydropower development potential in the basin. The article then presents
an account of the water supply and demand situation in the Chao Phraya Basin
of Thailand and emphasizes the need of water diversion from the Salween
basin to meet a part of water shortage in the Chao Phraya Basin. Several
water diversion routes to bring water from the Salween Basin to the Chao
Phraya Basin are described based on the recently concluded studies. The
impacts of the water diversion projects are also discussed. Some
recommendations are made with regard to water resources development in the
Salween Basin.

Keywords: Chao Phraya basin, hydropower potential, Salween basin, water
resources, water diversion.

1. Introduction

The Salween River, an Asian international river, originates from the Great
Himalayas in Tibet. During its course, the river travels through the south
of the China, the east of Myanmar, the west of Thailand, and along the
border of Thailand and Myanmar. From the Thai border, the river again flows
in the territory of Myanmar before discharging into the Andaman Sea. The
Salween Basin has huge water resources potential, which can be developed for
hydroelectric power generation and water use for different purposes within
the basin or nearby basins. The basin, therefore, can serve as a major
source of water and energy for the social and economic development of
Myanmar and Thailand in the future. The paper focuses on two aspects of
water resources development: (i) the hydropower potential/development in the
basin and (ii) the water diversion from the Salween Basin to the Chao Phraya
Basin of Thailand.

2. The Salween Basin

2.1 Basin characteristics

The Salween River, also known as the Than Lwin River is one of the major
international rivers in Southeast Asia. The main stem of the Salween river
originates in The Tangula Mountain in Tibetan plateau in China. It traverses
southward through Yunnan Province of China, Shan and Kayah States of
Myanmar, along The Myanmar-Thai border and then through The Kayin State of
Myanmar before draining into the Gulf of Moattama (Martaban) of Andaman Sea
at Moulmein. The entire length of the river is about 2,400 km and the total
drainage area of the basin is about 320,000 km2. The watershed area is
located in China (53 per cent), Myanmar (42 per cent) and Thailand (5 per
cent) as shown in figure 1.

In the upper stretch of the river in Yunnan Province of China, the river
flows into the deep gorges with rugged and steep mountains. The width of the
river basin is just about 20 km at some places in the Yunnan Province.

Numerous major tributaries, including Pang, Teng, Pawn, Hka and Hsim Rivers
join the Salween River in Myanmar. At about 320 km from the mouth, the river
forms the boundary between Myanmar and Thailand for a distance of about 120
km and then the Moei River (also named as Thaungyin), another important
tributary which runs toward northwest meets the Salween River. The Moei
River also forms The Thai-Myanmar border from its origin to the confluence
with The Salween River.

>From the confluence with The Moei River, the river again enters the
territory of Myanmar in the Kayin State. Before discharging into the Gulf of
Moattama, several more tributaries join The Salween River. The river passes
through the alluvial plain for a stretch of about 100-km from the mouth.

For an approximate total distance of 2,400 km, the bed elevation of the
Salween River drops by about 1,600 m. The average width of the basin,
calculated as the catchment area divided by the length, is 133.3 km. This
makes the length-width ratio of 18. Only a few rivers in the world have such
a high length-width ratio.

2.2 Water resources

The climate of the basin is influenced by both southwest monsoon in summer
(May to October) and northeast monsoon (November to April) in winter. The
middle and downstream reaches of the Salween River and the Moei River basins
belong to a typical tropical monsoon. The annual precipitation within the
Salween River basin ranges widely from around 1,200 mm in the midstream area
to over 2,000 mm in the upstream and downstream areas. But, in the coastal
areas of the basin, the annual rainfall is as high as 4,000 to 5,000 mm.

Stream flow data for the Salween River are very sparse. There are only two
gauging stations, namely, SWNl4 in Thailand and Hpa-An in Myanmar, on the
main stream of the Salween River. However, several gauging stations have
been established on the tributaries in the territories of Thailand.

Table 1 [omitted] provides the summary of hydrologic data recorded at the
selected gauging stations in the basin. [ ... ]  Since most of the basin
area is mountainous, the specific yield is relatively high and varies from
0.014 to 0.081 m3/s/km2 in the wet season (June-November) and from 0.003 to
0.010 m3/s/km2 in the dry season (December-May).

[ ... ]

An examination of table 1 clearly illustrates that the basin has abundant
water resources, which can be exploited for utilization within the basin for
irrigation development or by diverting water to the nearby basins in
Thailand where the water shortages are being faced due to extensive
agricultural development and increased demand of water from non-agricultural
sectors. The topography of the basin and longitudinal profiles along the
Salween River and its tributaries imply that there is a huge hydropower
potential to be tapped for meeting the ever increasing energy demand of
Thailand and Myanmar.

3. Hydropower potential and development in Salween Basin

3.1 Main Salween River

3.1.1 Past studies

In the past, several studies of hydropower development on the Salween River
were carried out by the Governments of Myanmar and Thailand or by the
international consultants. Due to non-availability of hydrologic,
topographic and other necessary data, the earlier studies were mainly based
on the very limited data, information collected during the field
reconnaissance. The studies conducted in the past are listed below:

1. "Desk Study on the Possibility of Development of a Hydroelectric Project
on Salween River" in 1979 by the National Energy Administration (NEA).
Thailand.
2. "Salween Multipurpose Project" for EGAT in 1980 by Snowy Mountains
Engineering Corporation (SMEC), Australia.
3. "Salween Multipurpose Project: Conceptual Plan" in 1981 by the Energy
Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT).
4. "Report on Possible Development Plan of Salween River" in 1981 by Nippon
Koei Co., Ltd. (NK), Japan.
5. "Desk Study on Possible Hydropower Projects on Salween River" in 1990 by
the Myanmar Electric Power Entries (MEPE), Myanmar.
6. "Preliminary Study on Hydropower Projects on River Bordering Thailand -
Myanmar" in 1992 by the Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. (EPDC), Japan.
7. "Preliminary Study of Hydroelectric Power Development Project in the
Middle Reaches of the Salween River" in 1993 by Nippon Koei Co.. Ltd. (NK),
Japan.

Studies Nos. 1, 2, 3 and part of 5 were preliminary investigations carried
out with the main objective of assessing the hydroelectric power and
irrigation development potentials in the lower reaches of the Salween River
along the boundary between Myanmar and Thailand or near the confluence with
the Moei River. Studies Nos. 4 and 6 provided the overall development plan
of the Salween River, downstream of the boundary between Myanmar and China.
Study No. 7 dealt with the hydroelectric power development scheme for the
middle reaches of the Salween River in Myanmar.

The hydropower projects recommended by these desk studies are located in the
plan and profile of the Salween River in figures 2 and 3, respectively. The
summary of the past hydropower development studies on the Salween River is
provided in table 2. As of now, there is no hydropower plant on the Salween
River. The proposed dam locations are nearer to each other in some of the
studies, which were conducted independently and at different times.
According to an estimate, a total of about 12,000 MW can be installed along
the Salween River.

3.1.2 Recent work

The preliminary studies for two hydropower development projects on the
Salween River have recently been completed for the Union of Myanmar. They
are the Hutgyi hydropower project and the Ta Sang hydropower project.

The study of Hutgyi hydropower project was completed in August 1998 (MEPE,
1998). The dam is located at about 33 km downstream of the Moei confluence.
It covers a watershed area of 311,093 km2 with a mean discharge of 4,105
m3/s. The project is designed as a run-of river type power plant to utilize
the available high discharge. The pondage will be created with the help of a
concrete gravity dam 37 m high at the crest elevation of 51 m MSL. The
normal high water level (NHWL) is set at 48 m MSL to avoid any influence to
the Thai border. The firm discharge of 1,420 m3/s and a design head of 24.2
m will utilize a total installed capacity of 300 MW (8 units of 37.5 MW) to
generate an annual energy of 2.148 GWh. The transmission line of 230 kV from
the Hutgyi power station to Thaton in Myanmar is about 70 km and to the Tak
2 substation in Thailand is about 250 km.

[ ... ]

The pre-feasibility study of Ta Sang hydropower project was prepared by
LAHMEYER INTERNATIONAL for the Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC), The Union
of Myanmar (MEC, 1998). The Ta Sang dam on Salween is in the southern part
of the Shan State in the Union of Myanmar near the Ta Sang ferry crossing
370 km east of Taunggyi on National Road No. 45 and 130 km from the check
point BP-I on the Thai border, about 150 km north of Chiang Mai in Thailand.
The dam catchment area is 207,000 km2. The concrete-faced rockfill dam with
a maximum height of 188 m and a total storage volume of 36,100 MCM at the
full supply level of 350 m MSL has been proposed. The design discharge of
2583 m3/s and the rated head of 142 m with an installed capacity of 3500 MW
will generate an annual energy of 23,006 GWh. The transmission line of 500
kV from the project to the Myanmar substation at Pyimnana will be 350 km
whereas it will be only 130 km to the substation at Chiangmai in Thailand.
The Ta Sang project is being studied for its feasibility by the Electric
Power Development Co., Ltd. (EPDC), Japan for the Government of Myanmar.

3.2 Tributaries of Salween River

Throughout its length in Myanmar, a number of large tributaries enter the
Salween River with steep slopes or sizable cascades. Consequently, there
exists a large hydropower potential on the tributary rivers. However, in
most of the cases, the proper locations of the hydropower projects are in
the remote areas of the country, which are far from the existing power
markets. This makes the hydropower development a relatively economically
less attractive as an energy source at this point of time. However, it is
expected that with relatively less adverse environmental impacts of
hydropower projects compared to the thermal power projects and the
hydro-energy being renewable source, these isolated projects will be
implemented in the near future.

Table 3 lists the status of hydropower development projects/studies on the
tributaries of the Salween River. So far only two hydropower stations with a
total installed capacity of 196 MW have been constructed on the Pawn River,
a major tributary of the Salween River on the right hand side. One more
hydropower-project on the Pawn River is presently under feasibility study.
In the lower basin, thee hydropower projects have been studied and proposed
on the Moei River (EPDC, 1992).

Table 3. Status of hydropower development on tributaries of Salween River

1. (Project Name) Baluchaung No. 1, (Sub-basin) Pawn, (Installed capacity)
28 MW, (Annual energy) 177 GWh, (Remarks) Operational since 1998
2. Baluchaung No.2, Pawn, 168 MW, 1080 GWh, Operational since 1962
3. Baluchaung No.3, Pawn, 48 MW, 327 GWh, Feasibility study
4. Yunzalin, Yunzalin, 530 MW, 1540 GWh, Desk study
5. Teng Falls,  Teng, 123 MW, - , Desk study
6. Moei 1, Moei River, 110 MW, 244, GWh,  Preliminary study
7. Moei 2,  Moei River, 230 MW, 523 GWh, Preliminary study
8. Moei 3, Moei River, 288 MW, 630 GWh,  Preliminary study

The map studies have indicated a huge potential of hydropower development on
the other tributaries as well as in the middle reaches of the Salween River.
However, there has been no systematic study taken up till now jointly or
independently by any of the parties concerned. It is, therefore, recommended
that a comprehensive and systematic master plan study for the hydropower
development in the basin be taken up which will be useful for the
development and management of energy resources in China. Myanmar and
Thailand.

4. The Chao Phraya Basin

The most important and largest river basin in Thailand is the Chao Phraya
Basin. The basin is the heart of the agricultural and economic activities in
the country. The demand of water for agricultural and nonagricultural
sectors has increased rapidly in recent years and the basin often faces
acute shortages of water, especially in the dry season.

[ omitted ]

5. Water diversion from Salween Basin

The Government of Thailand has realized the problem of water shortage in the
Chao Phraya Basin and has taken necessary steps to overcome the problem. The
department of Energy Development and Promotion (DEDP), Ministry of Science,
Technology and Environment of the Government of Thailand, has initiated a
project to examine the possibility of diverting water from the Salween River
and its tributaries, mainly the Moei River to augment the flow into the
Bhumibol Reservoir. The pre-feasibility of the "Moei - Salween - Chao Phraya
Diversion Project" was prepared by Panya Consultants Co., Ltd. (DEDP. 1995).
Several alternative diversion routes have been considered and analyzed to
bring water from the Salween River and from the Moei River to the Bhumibol
Reservoir. Another route from the Moei River to Bhumibol Reservoir via die
Mae Song Dam was recently studied for its feasibility by Aggie Consult Co.,
Ltd. (DEDP, 1996).

5.1 Water diversion schemes

Based on these studies, the four promising water diversion routes, two from
the Salween River and two from the Moei River to the Bhumibol Reservoir are
as follows:

Route 1: Salween - Upper Yuam - Bhumibol Reservoir
Route 2: Salween - Mae Lama Luang - Bhumibol Reservoir
Route 3: Moei - Huai Khanaeng Dam - Bhumibol Reservoir
Route 4: Moei - Mae Song Dam - Bhumibol Reservoir

These four diversion routes are depicted in figure 4.  The summary of main
project features of the water diversion schemes from the Salween River are
given in table 9 and from the Moei River are given in table 10. These
alternative water diversion routes are briefly described below.

[ omitted ]

5.2 Benefit areas

Any one or more of the alternative diversion schemes presented above, if
implemented, will benefit the Chao Phraya Basin of Thailand as a whole to a
great extent in solving the frequently faced water shortage problem in the
basin. Figure 5 [omitted] shows the location of existing large dams and
irrigation projects in the Chao Pluaya Basin. The direct benefit in terms of
water use for irrigation purposes, however, should concentrate in the Ping
River Basin and the Chao Phraya Delta area where the water scarcity is
critical, especially in the dry season (see Table 8).

The preliminary simulation study was conducted with one diversion from
Salween (Route 2) and one from Moei (Route 3) to Bhumibol to estimate
additional area which can be irrigated. The results indicate that with the
total diversion volume of about 3,500 MCM, an additional area of about 0.27
million ha (1.7 million rai) can be irrigated in the Chao Phraya Basin in
the dry season (RID. 1999).

The diversion schemes 2 and 3 will only partly meet the estimated water
shortage of 6,164 MCM in Chao Phraya in 20 years from now (see Table 8). The
Government of Thailand has to identify other sources to further increase the
water supply in the basin from other nearby basins or reduce the water
demand within the basin by improved water resources management.

5.2.1 Upper and lower Ping areas

[ omitted ]

5. 2. 2 Chao Phraya Delta

[ omitted ]

5.3 Project impacts

The water diversion project will have both positive and negative impacts.
The major positive impact of the project would be the increased and assured
water availability in the Chao Phraya Basin, especially in the dry season.
However, the construction of project facilities will adversely affect the
environment surrounding them.

The increased water availability will benefit die dry season cultivation,
domestic water supply, salinity control, navigation and industrial uses in
the Chao Phraya Basin. The incremental volume of water flowing into the
Bhumibol Reservoir because of water from the Routes 2 and 3 will be in the
order of 3,500 MCM per year. This amount is only about three per cent of the
average annual flow in the Salween River. Figure 6 depicts the water level
in Bhumibol without and with combined diversion from the Salween River
(Route 2) and the Moei River (Route 3). Moreover, the diversion schemes 2
and 3 will generate additional energy of 1,152.0 GWh at the Bhumibol power
plants.

The benefit in terms of improved water availability will, however, occur at
a certain cost of environmental degradation. Undesirable environmental
impacts of the water diversion projects will mainly be due to the
construction of dam and appurtenant structures, reservoir area, diversion
tunnel, and transmission line. These development activities will have impact
on people, reserved forest and watershed area. More in-depth study on
environmental impact assessment is required to evaluate and quantify the
project impacts and to suggest appropriate mitigation measures to minimize
the adverse environmental impacts.

6. Conclusions and recommendations

The Salween River is a virgin river with plenty of water resources. The
available high flows in the river and its tributaries suggest tremendous
potential of water resources development in the basin. The topography of the
basin favors hydroelectric power development along the river and its
tributaries. It is estimated that there is a total hydropower potential of
about 12,000 MW on the Salween River alone. The basin can play a major role
in supplying hydro-energy to serve the demand of electricity in Thailand and
Myanmar in the future. Therefore, a systematic master planning study to come
up with a realistic hydropower development plan for the Salween Basin is
urgently required.

The Salween River and its tributaries can provide water to the nearby basins
where severe water shortage will occur due to increased economic development
activities. From Thailand's perspective, an annual water diversion of about
3,500 MCM from the Salween and Moei Rivers together to the Chao Phraya River
will help improve the water supply situation, especially during the dry
season. About 0.27 million ha (1.7 million rai) of additional area can be
irrigated in the dry season in the Chao Phraya Basin with the diverted
water. It is worth mentioning that the diversion volume of 3,500 MCM is only
about three per cent of the total annual flow in the Salween River and hence
the diversion projects will not affect the flow regime and downstream demand
in the Salween Basin. The feasibility study of the water diversion schemes,
however, should consider pumping from the Salween and Moei Rivers only in
the wet season so that the dry season flows in the rivers are not affected.
Moreover, the ratio of amount of pumping to the flow in the Salween River or
Moei River should be in proportion to its catchment area lying in Thailand
to the total catchment area.

Since the catchment area of the Salween Basin encompasses three countries.
viz., China, Myanmar and Thailand, the water resource development in the
basin should be based on mutual benefit and exchange of information among
the parties concerned. A sound basin-wide approach should be adopted for
planning, development and management of water resources for sustainable
development and to tackle all possible environmental problems. Due
consideration should be given to the social and environmental impacts,
trans-boundary water issues, and water rights, laws, legislation and
policies of these countries. An institutional framework should be developed
at different levels in order to meet the long-term objectives of water
resources development and management.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the Department
of Energy Promotion and Development (DEDP), Ministry of Science, Technology.
and Environment, Royal Thai Government for permitting us to use some of the
data and information from the pre-feasibility study of "The Moei Salween -
Chao Phraya Diversion Project" in the paper. Sincere appreciation is also
expressed to Prof. Ashim Das Gupta of the Asian Institute of Technology,
Bangkok, Thailand for providing valuable comments to improve the quality of
the article.

References

Department of Energy Development and Promotion (DEDP). 1996. Feasibility
Study of Moei - Mae Song - Bhumibol Reservoir Diversion Project, Final
Report, prepared by Aggie Consult Co., Ltd., Bangkok. Thailand.

Department of Energy Development and Promotion (DEDP). 1995. The
Pre-feasibility Study of The Moei - Salween - Chao Phraya Diversion Project,
Final Report, prepared by Panya Consultants Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand.

Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand (EGAT). 1998. Personal
communication and supply of data by EGAT from their archive.

Electric Power Development Co., Ltd. (EPDC). 1992. Preliminary Study on
Hydropower Projects on Rivers Bordering Thailand-Myanmar, Final Report.
prepared for NEA of Thailand and MEPE of Myanmar.

Myanmar Economic Corporation (MEC). 1998. Pre-feasibility Study Ta Sang
Hydropower Project in the union of Myanmar, Final Report, prepared by
LAHMEYER INTERNATIONAL. Germany.

Myanmar Electric Power Enterprise (MEPE). 1998. Preliminary Feasibility
Study of Hutgyi Hydropower Project in the Union of Myanmar, Final Report,
prepared by NEWJEC INC., Japan.

Royal Irrigation Department (RID). 1999. Chao Phraya Water Management
Project, Draft Final Report, prepared by Panya Consultants Co., Ltd.,
Bangkok, Thailand.

World Resources Institute (WRI). 1996. World Resources 1996-97, a joint
publication by WRI, UNEP, UNDP, and WB, Oxford University Press.

List and explanation of abbreviations and acronyms
GWh   Giga watt-hour
ha   Hectare
km   Kilometer(s)
km2   Square kilometer(s)
km3   Cubic kilometer(s)
kW   Kilo-watt
m   Meter(s)
m3   Cubic meter(s)
m3/s   Cubic meters per second
MCM   Million cubic meters
MSL   Mean Sea Level
MW   Mega watt(s)
rai   Thai unit of area measurement (1 ha = 6.25 rai)
UNDP   United Nations Development Programme
UNEP   United Nations Environment Programme
WB   World Bank
WRI  World Resources Institute

********************************************

(3) SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS (SHAN): The Salween Dam Mineral Survey
Continues
March 17, 2000

Since November, a geological survey to ascertain mineral potential along the
Salween basin has been going on, said a S.H.A.N. source from the north.

Dr. Min Sway from the Department of Geology, University of Rangoon, and his
team went into the Tasang area, between Mongton Township, eastern Shan
State, and Mongpan Township, southern Shan State, on 8 November with the
drilling team of GMS Power from Bangkok.

The team of 4 led by Dr. Min Sway was reported in Nawnglurh, a village
halfway between Tasang and Mongpan again on 18 February doing a survey under
protection from LIB 520 (Mongpan) commanded by Maj. Myo Kyaw.

According to the latest report, the team was up in the north in
Loisang-Namlam, south of Tangyan, under the escort of LIB 507 (Lashio) on 8
March.

Details of their findings are not in the report.

The Shan State is reported to be the richest in natural resources in Burma.
A GMS source told S.H.A.N. that it would want to excavate all the marketable
minerals in the expected flood area before the dam is finished.

A Thai team, led by Dr. Suphorn Khuttathep from Chiangmai University, is
expected to conduct a socio-environmental impact assessment in the coming
months.

The dam project on the Salween has been facing opposition both from the
groups in the Shan State and environmental organizations since the outset in
late 1998.

///END\\\
For further information, please contact S.H.A.N. at:
Shan Herald Agency for News.
P.O. Box. 15, Nonghoi P.O., 50007, Chiangmai, Thailand
e-mail: <shan@cm.ksc.co.th

S.H.A.N. is a non-profit, independent Shan media group. It is not affiliated
to any political or armed organization.

********************************************

(4) SHAN HERALD AGENCY FOR NEWS: Wa's Applying for Logging Concession In the
Salween Dam Area
March 17, 2000

It was learned recently that the "Red Was" applied for logging concession in
the Tasang dam project area in return for the cost incurred in road
construction in eastern Shan State.

Wei Hsaitang, the commander of the Wa Special Brigade in Monghsat, on 25
November 1999, applied to Major general Thein Sein, Triangle Regional
Command (Kengtung), for permission to log the forest in Mongpulong, north of
Tasang, the projected Salween dam site, according to a source close to the
United Wa State Army.

In his application, Wei stated that his brigade had been spending
"considerable amount of funds" for the construction of Hsaikhao and Mongkied
concrete bridges, the rehabilitation of the Monghsat - Mongyang Nawngkhio -
Mongpiang road and the preparation to build the Loikha - Mongpulong road.

He also stated that the brigade would need to get back some of the funds in
order to use in the development of Loisarmsao (headquarters of the southern
command) and Banhoong (Wei Xuegarg's HQ) in Monghsat.

Accordingly, he asked Gen Thein Sein to approve the logging of 10,000 tons
of hard wood in Mongpulong.

According to the documents in possession of S.H.A.N., the UWSA received
permission on 20 February to cut 500 tons of hard wood.

Both the local people and the environmentalists fear destruction of the
remaining forests and more forced relocations of the people in the area.

///END\\\ For further information, please contact S.H.A.N. at:
Shan Herald Agency for News
P.O. Box. 15 Nonghoi P.O., 50007, Chiangmai, Thailand
e-mail: <shan@cm.ksc.co.th

S.H.A.N. is a non-profit, independent Shan media group. It is not affiliated
to any political or armed organization.

********************************************

(5) THE NATION: Gms Power to Kick-Start Laos Dam Project
February 12, 2000 by Nareerat Wiriyapong and Pichaya Changsorn

(from The BurmaNet News, Issue #1464, February 16, 2000)

After two years of delay, GMS Power Co aims to kick-start its Nam Ngum III
hydropower project in Laos and is looking for foreign partners and financing
with the hope of beginning construction early next year.

Although its parent company, the MDX Group, has not yet been able to solve
its debt problem, GMS Power is optimistic it can progress with the
US$600-million hydroelectric project.

GMS Power honorary adviser Subin Pinkayan said the project would be helped
by the company's successful completion in April 1998 of a previous dam in
Laos - the Nam Theun Hinboun dam. He said the 210-megawatt dam had a good
operating record and could generate some funding to partially finance the
new venture.

Laos had attracted a lot of interest from Thai and international investors
interested in hydro-electric power development following a bilateral
agreement under which Thailand has agreed to buy 3,000 megawatts (MW) of
power by 2006. But the recent economic crisis severely hit Thailand's
electricity demand and put a hold on several projects, including the Nam
Ngum III.

However, deputy prime minister Supachai Panitchpakdi, in his address to a
Greater Mekong Sub-region workshop held in Bangkok on Thursday, said
Thailand should promote regional co-operation by speeding up its
negotiations on power-purchase agreements with Laos concerning dam projects.

Supachai also told reporters that he had just come back from Laos, where he
looked into ways to expand bilateral co-operation.

"Laos was also hit hard by the regional crisis as its currency has
depreciated considerably. Therefore, we should speed up the signing of
power-purchase contracts. Wood is another potential market worth exploring.
Presently, Laos does not like to export timber, but there is the possibility
of it developing a wood-processing industry, whose end products we could
import to service our furniture industry," Supachai said. Subin said GMS
Power, which hopes to complete the 450 MW Nam Ngum III project by 2004,
would soon open bidding for the project.

He said the Asian Development Bank and Japan's Overseas Economic
Co-operation Fund would be approached to put up 70 per cent of the total
cost.

For the remainder, GMS Power would look for foreign partners to participate
in the project. Subin said that negotiations with a Japanese power company
were underway.

"Hydro-power plants could become a major source of income for the Greater
Mekong Sub-region (GMS), which has vast resources when looking at
hydro-electric power. Income from the Theun Hinboun plant, for example,
accounts for roughly 8 per cent of Laos' gross domestic product," he said.

Thailand would retain its status as the main outlet for electricity produced
from GMS countries as its economic growth was now in the black again, Subin
said. Thailand, which saw a 13 per cent per year growth in electricity
consumption prior to the economic crisis, has signed memorandums of
understanding to purchase another 3,000 MW of electricity from China, and
1,500 MW from Burma.

He said apart from Laos, GMS Power also has a 1,500 MW Jinghong hydropower
project in Yunnan, China, for which a feasibility study has been completed.
As For Burma, Subin said the company was working with the Myanmar
Electricity Planning Enterprise and Myanmar Economic Corp to lay down the
foundations for a successful partnership concerning dam projects.

Burma has several potential sites for hydropower projects on the Than Lwin
River and its tributaries.

The GMS covers Burma, China's Yunnan province, Cambodia, Lao, Vietnam, and
Thailand.

********************************************

(6) IRN DAY OF ACTION - MARCH 14

On March 14, Salween Watch participated in the International Rivers Network
International Day of Action with a virtual protest.  Below is the
announcement:

On March 14th, river activists from around the world unite for the
International Day of Action Against Dams and for Rivers, Water and Life. The
day was announced by the participants of the First International Meeting of
People Affected by Dams held in Curitiba, Brazil in 1997. March 14th is the
Brazilian Day of Struggles Against Dams.

By acting together we: (1) Strengthen local groups by linking them to the
global network of dam fighters and river protectors; (2) Show the world a
diverse, world-wide movement dedicated to the health of rivers and the
people that depend on them; and (3) Discover equitable and sustainable ways
to manage our waterways.

For more information, visit our web page at www.irn.org/dayofaction

"Don't Dam the Salween" - A Virtual Protest

Salween Watch is a coalition of organizations and people affected by and
concerned about the planned damming of the Salween River in Burma.  The
coalition, which includes Shan, Karenni, and Karen people of Burma as well
as NGO's supporting these communities, is strongly opposed to the dam and
its accompanying environmental degradation.  We do not want our villages
relocated to make room for the enrichment of the illegitimate government of
Burma and the Thai businesses.  We do not want to endure the forced labor
that will surely come with such a large development project.  We would also
like to challenge the Thai developer, GMS, regarding the ethics of building
a dam in partnership with the Burmese military government, whose track
record of human rights abuses, especially around development projects, is
atrocious.

Unfortunately, our participation in the May 14 Day of Action Against Dams
can only consist of a virtual protest through this forum because of severe
repression by the State Peace and Development Council, whose tactics against
resistance typically include
torture, rape, imprisonment, and extrajudicial killings.

(For more information, please contact salweenwatch@hotmail.com.  A web site
with more information on the damming of the Salween River will be available
soon.)

********************************************





