[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (fwd from ipsec) Re: Handling of IPcomp in IKEv2
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Avram" == Avram Shacham <shacham@shacham.net> writes:
Avram> At 19:51 30.11.2002 -0500, Charlie_Kaufman@notesdev.ibm.com wrote:
Avram> [snip]
>> Rather, each node should announce what compression algorithms it is capable
>> of decompressing and the two byte CPIs associated with each one. A sending
>> node can optionally compress any outgoing packet with any of the algorithms
>> supported by the other end. This has several advantages:
>>
Avram> [snip]
>> What do people think? Am I still confused?
>>
>> --Charlie
Avram> Brilliant.
It is a slight change to how IPCOMP works.
I think that it is worth it, in my opinion.
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBPe1WOoqHRg3pndX9AQEo/AQArTwQdevn7osYY5xtc98nVsqsIjVPYXmx
cJ3zF88T+wBDSyelQEY1MNyhnkynRtTE8MVROGjOoRZfS33uXgw+9T/QOlNWwnVz
tCGevjD5GMUabvywLoZuRaJ8g11pvbSvr0oU2mZz95Gg/jCiCf42bL9VFXTTFf7U
E0E7h2jJj3c=
=Lqu1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----