[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Summary of revised identity changes
Paul Hoffman / VPNC writes:
> What isn't in the current proposal is hashes of bare keys, but that's
> easy to add. If we do, you still don't need IDs: the hash of the key
> is the ID. Does the WG want bare public keys as part of this?
I'd like to see this functionality preserved, yes.
If only it had been the *only* kind of public key
identity... we'd probably see a lot less use of
password based legacy auth.
Mike