[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

dam-l 15 June 1999 - Tibetans oppose World Bank projec



Tibet Information Network News Update
15 June 1999 - Tibetans oppose World Bank project
ISSN: 1355-3313

The World Bank has admitted that a number of Tibetans have objected to a
Project involving the immigration of tens of thousands of Chinese farmers into
a Tibetan area of Qinghai province despite the risks they face of expressing
their views in public. Ten per cent of Tibetans interviewed by a Chinese
governmental organisation for the Bank said that they opposed the project and
another 29% refused to express support for the development scheme, which has
also been criticised by the US government and international campaign groups.
Local farmers and herdsmen expressed concern about the ecological impact of the
project and the risks of unrest due to the influx of immigrants. The Chinese
government does not allow national minorities to express any opinions that are
different to those of the state, claiming that this would be "detrimental to
the Motherland".

The World Bank has postponed its decision to fund the Chinese Western Poverty
Reduction project following the controversy, delaying the project's
presentation to the Board of the Bank from 8 June to 22 June. The Dalai Lama,
who was born in one of the counties where the new settlers will come from,
Pingan (Tsongkhakhar in Tibetan) in Haidong prefecture, has appealed to the
Bank to reconsider the project because of the long-term implications for the
survival of Tibetan culture and national identity in the area, while US
Treasury Secretary Robert Rubin said earlier this month that the US government
was "enormously concerned" about the project and "inclined to oppose it".

The delay may affect China's eligibility for concessionary interest rates from
the Bank, which loans more money to China than any other financial institution.
It also threatens the close relationship between China and the World Bank,
which provided more than US$2 billion of loans and grants to China last year.
According to a reliable source, Chinese officials have told World Bank
representatives in different countries that lack of support for the project
will call into question their economic relationship with China.

The proposed China Western Poverty Reduction Project is a major poverty
Alleviation scheme which includes the relocation of 57,775 poor farmers from
eastern Qinghai province - mainly Han and Hui Muslim Chinese but also including
3,466 Tibetans - west to Dulan county (Tulan in Tibetan) in the Qaidam Basin in
western Qinghai. The population transfer would increase the Chinese population
of the area and make Tibetans and Mongolians an even more marginal minority
there, reducing the percentage of Tibetans in the area from 22.7% to 14.0%,
according to World Bank figures. A summary document issued last week by the
World Bank acknowledged that the percentage of Mongolians, the other indigenous
inhabitants of the area, would also fall dramatically. The percentage of Hui
Muslims in the area would rise from 4.6% to 33.6% and that of Han Chinese from
26.3% to 41.3%, according To World Bank figures.

A spokesman for the World Bank told TIN that 9.9% of 56 Tibetan households in
the project area expressed opposition to the relocation scheme during the
formal consultation process, even though officials were present and despite the
risks of expressing their opinions in public. Tibetans can receive prison
sentences for expressing their views in Tibet; the Chinese government does not
allow national minorities to claim to any conflict between their interests and
those of the Chinese state. Only 29% of the Tibetan households consulted in the
survey, which was carried out by the state-controlled Qinghai Plateau
Geographic Research Institute, said that they welcomed the Dulan component of
the poverty alleviation scheme, with the remaining 62% stating that they were
"neutral" about the implications of the project. A World Bank spokesman said
that they were "encouraged" by the level of opposition to the project, as it
indicated that some free expression appeared to be permitted to Tibetans. The
spokesman also said that the neutrality expressed by Tibetans appeared to be
"positive". 

All of the farmers and herdsmen interviewed in Dulan county expressed concern
about the effects of the project on the ecology of the area, according to a
second survey carried out by the World Bank among 159 households representing
Chinese, Tibetan and Mongolian inhabitants of the county. The Environmental
Impact Assessment published by the Bank states that 100% of farmers and
herdsmen interviewed in different areas in the move-in region (Balong township,
Chasuhe, Qingshuihe and Yikegaoli) worry that "the cutting of vegetation will
destroy the ecological environment and the wild animal and plant resources".
Twenty-one per cent of the farmers and herdsmen of different nationalities
interviewed worry that the influx of immigrants and the increase in population
"will cause more social unrest", according to the World Bank report. The survey
also states that the majority of these interviewees (93%) in the presence of
officials "expressed their willingness to follow the arrangement of the
government, willing to accept immigrants". This response, when set in the
context of the misgivings expressed regarding the environment and social
unrest, suggests an awareness among the sample interviewees that to object to
government policies is illegal. It is not known whether the real level of
apprehension about "social unrest" between national minorities is reflected in
the statistics given.

The World Bank spokesman said last week that the Bank had not been aware before
carrying out the survey that Tibetans can be sentenced for offences that
include "damaging national ethnic unity". TIN is in possession of official
Chinese sentencing documents which classify the "creation of ethnic disputes"
or "attempts to eliminate the unity of the nationalities" as criminal offences.
Three Tibetans were sentenced in 1994 in Haixi prefecture, which incorporates
Dulan county, for offences that were described as "criminal activities for
splitting and damaging ethnic unity". One of the Tibetans, 29-year old Namlo
Yag, was imprisoned for four and a half years for offences including "illegally
organising a counter-revolutionary group" and "engaging in Tibet independence
activities". Namlo Yag, who escaped from Tibet in February and is now living in
exile, said that his criticism of Chinese immigration into Tibet was included
among these "independence activities".

"I opposed Chinese immigration to Tibet because it endangers the cultural and
social identity of Tibetans, as well as their jobs," Namlo Yag told TIN
yesterday. "My own experience shows just how dangerous it is for Tibetans in
Tibet to express their opposition to such politically sensitive issues. The
Tibetans who expressed their concern about the World Bank project are really
brave. It is not surprising that they have objected to a project like this, as
they know better than anyone about the long-term consequences of the influx of
people into a place like Dulan. It will increase tensions between Tibetans,
Mongolians, and Chinese, and will lead to even more people coming in from
China. Those Tibetans who expressed their dissent have stepped off the cliff.
Now my biggest wish is that they should be protected, and that international
organisations should do what they can to help them."

The official Chinese news agency Xinhua reported today that Tibetans in the
Dulan area had "expressed their vigorous support" for the project. Chinese
Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Zhang Qiyue was quoted as saying at a briefing
today (15 June) that reports from "Western media and Tibetan splittist
organisations" that "China assimilates Tibetans" were wrong. Zhang said that
the World Bank funded project in Qinghai is proven to meet all criteria for
World Bank loans, and that it was "in accordance with the choice of the locals,
including Tibetans, who have expressed their vigorous support." She extended an
invitation to any overseas journalists to visit Qinghai "at any time" to carry
out research on the issues involved.

A World Bank official who visited Dulan county last week, Director of Strategy
and Operations Julian Schweitzer, said yesterday that Tibetans had given him
two letters about the project. Both letters expressed support for the project
and appeared to represent the viewpoint of the local authorities. "Mongolians,
Tibetans and Han Chinese have been living in the Qinghai region for many
generations, and Qinghai belongs to all the people in the region," stated one
of the letters, which was addressed to the President of the World Bank. "The
movement of people to different areas will not affect the identity of a
nationality. We welcome the financial assistance of the World Bank and our
government's support." Julian Schweitzer said that it would be the highest
priority for the World Bank to ensure that there were no consequences for the
Tibetans who had expressed opposition to the project during the consultation
process.

China-World Bank ties under threat

The controversy over the project following a news report by TIN on 27 April has
called into question the World Bank's close relationship with China. Last month
Bank officials responsible for the project said that China may "re-evaluate its
relationship with the World Bank", and a World Bank official told TIN that
China had even threatened to stop borrowing from the Bank. A reliable source
indicates that the World Bank's President, James Wolfensohn, is aware that the
resolution of the controversy over the project may be seen as indicative of the
level of success of reforms he has tried to introduce at the Bank. Since he
became president of the Bank in June 1995, Wolfensohn has aimed to introduce a
greater degree of accountability within the Bank, incorporating a more
effective response to criticism of Bank projects by external organisations and
individuals. If the project is approved by the Board, the only further recourse
for groups critical of the project is to the Bank's Inspection Panel.

The timing of the presentation of the Dulan project to the Board this month is
particularly sensitive, as China's eligibility for International Development
Association (IDA) funds expires at the end of June, and a delay would mean that
the Bank would have to reclassify the funds. The aim of IDA funding is to offer
concessionary terms to countries judged to be too poor to borrow at commercial
rates; interest-free loans, technical assistance and policy advice are provided
to promote growth and reduce poverty in a number of countries including China.
Borrowers pay a fee of less than one per cent of the loan to cover
administrative costs and repayment is extended over a period of about 40 years.

China has been a member of the World Bank since 1981 and has been the Bank's
largest recipient of investment financing since 1992. World Bank lending to
China in the 1998 fiscal year totalled $2.62 billion (including $293.4 million
in IDA funds) for 31 projects in 23 provinces in China. "Close collaboration
with the Chinese government has been established," the World Bank states in the
Staff Appraisal Report for the China Western Poverty Reduction Project, which
Includes the relocation of farmers into Dulan county as the Qinghai component.
"The Bank Group has played an active role in the development of the new
national Strategy for reducing absolute poverty in the 1990s." According to
their Country Brief on China in September 1997, the World Bank's priorities in
China include reform of the tax system and of state-owned enterprises; budget
management; the building of railways, highways, ports, power stations and other
parts of the infrastructure, and the intensification of agriculture and energy
efficiency.

The World Bank states that the aim of the China Western Poverty Reduction
Project is to alleviate poverty in the region. World Bank funding will also
contribute towards the fulfilment of the Chinese government's aim to develop an
infrastructure in the region in order to exploit mineral resources. "It is
likely that Tibetans will view the Dulan project as an effort to import
non-Tibetan farmers who will feed non-Tibetan workers who have come to the
prefecture of Haixi to Exploit the region's abundant mineral deposits - which
China's constitution appropriates to Beijing as 'state property'," states a
briefing paper issued by the Washington-based International Campaign for Tibet
(ICT) on 8 June. "It is a formula in which Tibetans view themselves as
predetermined losers, culturally, demographically and economically. The Bank is
equally likely to be viewed as complicit in this wider effort, whether or not
the Bank acknowledges awareness of the economic landscape beyond Dulan."

Criticism by Tibetans in exile

A Tibetan nun who left Dulan county in 1996 has told TIN that the continued
influx of Hui Muslim and Han Chinese into the county adversely affects the
livelihoods of Tibetans. "More and more Han Chinese and Salar people [who are
Muslims of Turkic origin, and also not indigenous to the region] are coming
into Dulan," the Tibetan nun, who now lives in exile in India, told TIN. "This
project will bring in many more people. This really harms the livelihood of
Tibetans because we lose more of our land. Also, it means we have to pay more
tax in order to subsidise the economic development of the county."

The Tibetan nun, who asked not to be named for fear of repercussions for her
relatives in Tibet, confirmed that mining in the county was a key priority for
the local authorities. "Iron, copper and lead are currently being mined in
Dulan and there is a great deal of mineral prospecting for different ores
throughout the county, frequently causing environmental damage; the grass often
doesn't grow properly in the pasturelands and so our livestock are affected,"
she said. "Most of the people who work in the mines are Chinese and Muslims
(Salar or Hui people)."

The Tibetan nun said that she feared for the future of Tibetans in Dulan County
if the World Bank scheme went ahead. "Our parents used to tell us that the
Panchen Lama was dead and that the Dalai Lama is in India, so we should not
speak up; if we complained we would suffer consequences from the authorities.
It is only now I am in exile that I can express my opinion that the relocation
of people into Dulan county should not go ahead."

Another Tibetan from Qinghai province, who is also living in exile, told TIN
that birth control policies became more "aggressive" when there was an Influx
of Chinese into an area. "People in Qinghai worry about the birth control
policies becoming more aggressive because the government tells locals that
there is 'too little land for too many people', and so they must have stricter
quotas on the number of children allowed per family," the Tibetan said. "Many
Chinese people have been moving into Qinghai province since the early 1960s,
and they have taken a great deal of the good land for farming and
industrialisation. As a result of this, many Tibetans and Mongolians are forced
to abandon the nomadic life because of the shortage of grassland."

Further opposition to the project among Tibetans was expressed in two Letters
received from Dulan county by the International Campaign for Tibet, with one of
the letters stating that the relocation project was "evidence of the Chinese
policy of the ethnic cleansing of the Tibetan people."  A World Bank official
told TIN: "The letters expressing the feelings of Tibetans concerned underscore
the enormous sensitivity of this project, and they echo concerns that have been
consistently expressed in recent meetings by World Bank staff and management
with various groups. These concerns basically indicate that there were many
dimensions to this project that we frankly did not appreciate at the time of
project preparation."

The Bank official also said that the visit of one of his most senior
colleagues, Julian Schweitzer, the Director of Strategy and Operations, to
Dulan last Week reflected the concern of the Bank over criticisms expressed of
the project. 

"It is unprecedented for such a senior official to visit the project area at
this stage," said the Bank spokesman. "It is a very unusual step for us and
reflects very clearly our desire to check up on as much of the detail and the
queries raised as possible." Julian Schweitzer told TIN that he saw no evidence
of "tensions" in the region and that there was evidence that the cultural
identity and religion of Tibetans was being preserved.

The summary paper released by the World Bank last week claims that the Project
will not "dilute the Tibetan population" of Dulan county because the relocation
is to be carried out in the same province, Qinghai. However, although Qinghai
was declared a province of China in 1929, absorbing the traditional Tibetan
area of Amdo, there was little centralised control. Earlier this century,
thousands of people in Qinghai died as indigenous Tibetans and Mongols resisted
armed colonisation by Chinese Hui Muslims. The ICT briefing paper states that
the World Bank "has inadvertently positioned itself to rekindle hostilities
which have cooled during the past 50 years". The ICT paper states: "It is
unlikely that Tibetans in Dulan county would view the arrival of nearly 50,000
Chinese, Hui and Salar as being significantly different in nature than what
their fathers and grandfathers may have died resisting. Tibetan expressions of
anger at this project are not made lightly. While the Bank has compared this to
a move 'from Paris to Lyon', a more appropriate comparison might be from
Belgrade to Pristina." 

Mongolians and Tibetans are the indigenous inhabitants of Dulan county; the
displacement and marginalisation of Tibetan farmers on the river plains began
in the 1920s, and accelerated after the Communist Party came to power in 1949.
The continued dilution of the Tibetan population could lead the area to lose
its status of "nationality autonomy" - Dulan is officially designated an area
of "Tibetan" autonomy within Qinghai. Despite assurances from the provincial
authorities in Qinghai to the World Bank that the autonomous status of the
prefecture would continue to be respected and that the province would continue
to guarantee the rights of Tibetans, the final decision on any change of status
for an autonomous prefecture is made by the State Council in Beijing, and not
at provincial level.

The proposed transfer of settlers into the Qaidam Basin area in Qinghai is Part
of a major World Bank development project involving other parts of Qinghai,
neighbouring Gansu province and Inner Mongolia and costing $334 million. The
$40 million Of resettlement funds proposed by the World Bank to fund the
resettlement of the farmers from five counties to Dulan county in Haixi
prefecture is in part a loan to be repaid by the new settlers.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++=

The Tibet Information Network (TIN) is an independent news and research service
that provides information and analysis of the current political, economic,
social, environmental and human rights situation in Tibet

TIBET INFORMATION NETWORK
188-196 Old Street LONDON EC1V 9FR UK
TIN UK  
ph: +44 (0)171 814 9011 
fax: +44 (0)171 814 9015 
email: tin@tibetinfo.net

IN USA  
ph:+1 (0)307 733 4670  
fax: +1 (0)307 739-2501  
email: tinusa@wyoming.com
http://www.tibetinfo.net