[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

DAM-L LS: Outcry Greets Indian Court's Clearance for Dam (fwd)



----- Forwarded message from owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net -----

From owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net  Thu Oct 19 16:50:12 2000
Return-Path: <owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net>
Received: from DaVinci.NetVista.net (mjdomo@mail.netvista.net [206.170.46.10])
	by lox.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA23711
	for <dianne@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 16:49:45 -0400 (EDT)
From: owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net
Received: [(from mjdomo@localhost)
	by DaVinci.NetVista.net (8.10.0/8.8.8) id e9JKGMi29307
	for irn-narmada-list; Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net)]
Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2000 13:16:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200010192016.e9JKGMi29307@DaVinci.NetVista.net>
subject: LS: Outcry Greets Indian Court's Clearance for Dam
Sender: owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net
Precedence: bulk

                Thursday October 19 9:10 AM ET
                Outcry Greets Indian Court's Clearance for Dam

                NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Booker prize-winning writer
                Arundhati Roy led a howl of protest Thursday after India's
                highest court cleared the way for a controversial dam stalled
                for six years by an environmental lawsuit.

                Wednesday's stamp of approval from the Supreme Court 
did little to dampen the spirit of
                critics led by Medha Patkar, head of the Narmada 
Bachao Andolan (NBA or the Save
                Narmada Movement).

                ``We will certainly go back to the people. People are 
ready to fight a battle even beyond
                this verdict,'' said Patkar, who staged a 26-day 
hunger strike against the Narmada river
                hydroelectric project in 1994.

                Patrick McCully, campaigns director of the California 
based environment and human
                rights organization International Rivers Network, 
added his voice to the outcry against the
                verdict.

                ``The ruling is utterly illogical and an insult to 
democracy and justice,'' he said in a
                statement.

                ``The Sardar Sarovar Project is one of the world's 
most controversial dam projects and
                would forcibly displace more people than any other 
infrastructure project in the world
                except for China's notorious Three Gorges Dam.''

                Patkar, who crisscrossed hundreds of miles in the 
central Indian Narmada valley in years
                of building up her movement, broke down in tears at a 
Bombay news conference
                Wednesday.

                ``The court is bound by law, but people are bound by 
life and livelihood,'' said Patkar, who
                cites reasons ranging from low economic gains and 
environmental damage to emotional
                trauma for the tribals being displaced by the project 
for opposing the dam.

                Patkar wanted the Indian president to intervene to 
stop the project which mainly covers
                the central Madhya Pradesh state and the western 
Gujarat state. Gujarat is banking on the
                project to ease its acute water needs.

                Court Decision ``Heartbreaking''

                The Narmada Valley development project is India's 
biggest dam project. Some 3,200
                small, medium-sized and large dams are to be built on 
the 1,300-km (800-mile) river and
                its tributaries to generate electricity and provide 
water to millions of people.

                Roy, who donated to the Narmada cause the $35,000 
prize money she won in 1997 for her
                novel ``The God of Small Things,'' said the court 
decision was ``heartbreaking.''

                ``The court has crushed the most non-violent peoples' 
movement in the country,'' the
                Indian Express quoted her as saying.

                ``This shows that you can stand in front of the map of 
India and throw darts anywhere on
                it without bothering about the environmental or human 
costs or analyzing its benefits for
                the people,'' she said after the verdict was announced 
Wednesday.

                The Supreme Court in a majority judgement of 
two-to-one struck down a petition filed by
                Patkar's environmental group, and asked the 
governments of Gujarat and Madhya
                Pradesh to resume construction of the Sardar Sarovar dam.

                The petition was mainly against raising the height of 
Sardar Sarovar, the biggest of the
                dams being built, which would submerge hundreds of 
villages and displace millions of
                people.

                McCully said several hundred thousand people will now 
lose their livelihoods to irrigation
                canals, housing for construction workers, the 
desiccation of the river downstream of the
                dam and a wildlife reserve planned to compensate for 
the ecosystems to be flooded.

                Raising the height of the dam to 90 meters (295 feet) 
from 88 meters will be taken up
                immediately, in line with the Supreme Court decision, 
the Gujarat government said.

                The project is being largely financed by state 
governments and market borrowings after
                the World Bank withdrew financing in 1993, and is 
expected to be fully completed in 2025.


-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to majordomo@netvista.net
with no subject and the following text in the body of the message
"unsubscribe irn-narmada".

----- End of forwarded message from owner-irn-narmada@netvista.net -----