[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[IPSECKEY] Re: comments request on IPSECKEY BOF description
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Dan" == Dan Massey <masseyd@ISI.EDU> writes:
Dan> I just got off a plane so I'm still reading email in pieces...
Dan> I'd like to suggest one minor very change in the agenda wording.
Dan> The description captures the idea that the KEY record was restrcited
Dan> so I think everyone agrees on the concepts, but the title "Why KEY is
Dan> being obsoleted" struck me as a little off. How about something
Dan> more like:
Dan> "Why KEY record subtypes were obsoleted."
Dan> "Why the KEY record is no longer available to applications."
Dan> "Why the KEY record was restricted to only DNSSEC keys."
Good point.
I like the last one.
(I have a problem with "applications" - it is a relative term. )
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBPZ3f1YqHRg3pndX9AQE51AP/TfZk09JxVgJJrNhfgXAaNYunrwUdFmKl
EB+9iEIIX5krEkuZnfMNpi3Efej15yesgz4tMA36kZ8RLDcrtBm4N7ypsdDDJSZG
fqnreTpODAp2/kmPPkcPUXguX0mOUk+SQsxWp3H5s4BH68umPQ9AbxqZvQKOxY0D
0jwbhMz6L80=
=Rowh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
This is the IPSECKEY@sandelman.ca list.
Email to ipseckey-request@sandelman.ca to be removed.