[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [IPSECKEY] ultimate nits ?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>>> "Jean-Jacques" == Jean-Jacques Puig <Jean-Jacques.Puig@int-evry.fr> writes:
Jean-Jacques> In latest submission:
I assume you mean -02.
draft> An IPSECKEY resource record MUST be used in combination with DNSSEC
draft> unless some other means of authenticating the IPSECKEY resource record
draft> is available.
Jean-Jacques> Doesn't this contradict current choice of SHOULD in security
Jean-Jacques> considerations ?
I guess that it does.
I will change this to a SHOULD. We moderated it with the rest of the
sentence, but your point is well taken.
Jean-Jacques> 2.6 RDATA format - RSA public key
Thanks for the other nits.
I stared at the numbers for each for awhile, and I guess I didn't get
them all. Numbers without labels are hard for us humans :-)
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys
iQCVAwUBPtTyg4qHRg3pndX9AQHYtgQA7b7TCeOuc+KYMeVwpw811Oy5OlYgRBpO
8UmWA8hv9JpdS1ZcMCyLSuCp9o8MXh61lbD6s/gNR9INyACN3cZkly1FBR1am80j
SrvfkVmIwkPOhl6GsFX8wfOeku5A7wYvd/YCVWijGTdjRq9qFqatkLAhP2XcublS
pCYY4rbKbzI=
=cNZs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
This is the IPSECKEY@sandelman.ca list.
Email to ipseckey-request@sandelman.ca to be removed.