[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [IPSECKEY] ultimate nits ?



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "Jean-Jacques" == Jean-Jacques Puig <Jean-Jacques.Puig@int-evry.fr> writes:
    Jean-Jacques> In latest submission:
  
  I assume you mean -02.

draft> An IPSECKEY resource record MUST be used in combination with DNSSEC
draft> unless some other means of authenticating the IPSECKEY resource record
draft> is available. 

    Jean-Jacques> Doesn't this contradict current choice of SHOULD in security
    Jean-Jacques> considerations ?

  I guess that it does.
  I will change this to a SHOULD. We moderated it with the rest of the
sentence, but your point is well taken.
  
    Jean-Jacques> 2.6 RDATA format - RSA public key

  Thanks for the other nits.
  I stared at the numbers for each for awhile, and I guess I didn't get
them all. Numbers without labels are hard for us humans :-)

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPtTyg4qHRg3pndX9AQHYtgQA7b7TCeOuc+KYMeVwpw811Oy5OlYgRBpO
8UmWA8hv9JpdS1ZcMCyLSuCp9o8MXh61lbD6s/gNR9INyACN3cZkly1FBR1am80j
SrvfkVmIwkPOhl6GsFX8wfOeku5A7wYvd/YCVWijGTdjRq9qFqatkLAhP2XcublS
pCYY4rbKbzI=
=cNZs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
This is the IPSECKEY@sandelman.ca list.
Email to ipseckey-request@sandelman.ca to be removed.